off desp
230 of 22nd Left: 1892 [M 15879/4]
"in that paragraph the word "remitting" is a clerical error for "receiving". As the context shows, Lord Ripon sees no reason for reconsidering that decision, the words in 1890 quoted by Z.A. will in future draw leave salaries to cover the whole service of an officer's future in any capacity in Hong Kong. The later words quoted by him were meant rather to deal with cases of officers promoted from one office to another, not receiving any increase of pay in 1890.
If M. Ackroyd's claim were admitted, M. Lawrie, P. Judge in Ceylon, ought to be allowed a similar right of going back to the 2p rate; for he formerly held an office which got the 20 percent rise, & so got his leave salary at 1/10=, but has since been promoted to a post, P. Judge, which did not get the 20 percent rise.
I agree that M. Ackroyd should not be given what he asks, but on paper he can make out a good case for himself. The real reason for not giving him what he wants is that the receipt of very substantial emoluments on promotion from Registrar to Puisne Judge is tantamount to entering the service under new conditions, and he cannot, having been given an increase of salary on being elevated to a higher position, yet claim his old privileges.
As to cases of the kind, because no increase was made to the Puisne Judge's salary, I should decline without hesitation. Therefore, leave out the part of M. Johns' minute which I have put in brackets.
CPS 5 June 97
Page 614
Daftaue
Page 614 appears to be a page numbering notation and is kept as is.
is removed as per rule 12. The corrected output is as follows:off desp
230 of 22nd Left: 1892 [M15879/4]
"in that paragraph the word "remitting" is a clerical error for "receiving". As the context shows, Lord Ripon sees no reason for reconsidering that decision, the words in 1890 quoted by Z.A. will in future draw leave salaries to cover the whole service of an officer's future in any capacity in Hong Kong. The later words quoted by him were meant rather to deal with cases of officers promoted from one office to another, not receiving any increase of pay in 1890.
If M. Ackroyd's claim were admitted, M. Lawrie, P. Judge in Ceylon, ought to be allowed a similar right of going back to the 2p rate; for he formerly held an office which got the 20 percent rise, & so got his leave salary at 1/10=, but has since been promoted to a post, P. Judge, which did not get the 20 percent rise.
I agree that M. Ackroyd should not be given what he asks, but on paper he can make out a good case for himself. The real reason for not giving him what he wants is that the receipt of very substantial emoluments on promotion from Registrar to Puisne Judge is tantamount to entering the service under new conditions, and he cannot, having been given an increase of salary on being elevated to a higher position, yet claim his old privileges.
As to cases of the kind, because no increase was made to the Puisne Judge's salary, I should decline without hesitation. Therefore, leave out the part of M. Johns' minute which I have put in brackets.
CPS 5 June 97
Page 614
Daftaue
1
off desp
230 of 22nd Left: 1892 [m 15879/4]
"in that paragraph
the word "remitting
clexical error for
being
འ
A
"receiving
leave salan or Jension
Wufficient
as the context shows, affirm that Lord Ripon sees no reason for
reconsidering
[a
in his o
LL
that decision,
the
words in
1890 quoted by z.a.
their
will in future draw
I do
leave salaries to cover the whole thinks this
service
of an officers future in any capacity in Hengthong, the later words quoted byhum
to
ал
to promotions" te were meant rather to deal with
cases of officers promoted from
office, not
not receiving any 1890 to
of pay in 1890
Then rec?
zze
office that
~~
increase
Ju 95 June
[If M. Ackroyd's claim were admitted, M. Lawrie, P. Judge in Ceylon, ought to be allowed a similar right of going back to the 2p rate; for he formerly office which got the 20percent vise, & so got his leave parte at 1/10=, but has since been promoted to a post, P. Juize, which did not get the 20 to rise
[sine]
held
I agre be given
that M. Ackroyd should not
what he asks.
but on paper
is say
in 1590. who rebu
the 4/2 ra
he
can make out a
614
case good for him -self. The real reason for not giving him what he wants is that be the
Enceipt of very substantial fromation as from registrer to Puisne Judge is tanta. mowni- to reentering
the service lender
new conditions, and. He cannot, having been given
au increase au
ryistan
of
of that increase a had a lower
afe
in napaja cate /
I be elevated to a
higher position a
trans a higher salary d yet claim his old privileges.
i
as to rais, cases of the dsilag because no increase was made to the
Puisne Judge's salary.
I should decline without agning therefore leave out the part of brackets.
leave out the part of M. Johns is minute Which I have put
M. Wh
kut
CPS
5 Jane 97
6.6
Daftatue
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.